Listening vs Understanding Users
The difference between passively listening to users and actively understanding them in context. Why data is a signal, not an alarm.
There is a popular sentence in product teams:
"The best product people listen to users and make data-driven decisions."
I think this sentence is often misunderstood.
At its core
Listening ≠ understanding
Data ≠ reality
Listening to users is passive. Understanding users is active.
This means, a product builder is not someone who only reads surveys or checks dashboards.
Data is a signal, not an alarm
Data gives a "signal". It is not an "alarm".
A signal says "look here". It does not say "do this".
A better definition
Maybe the sentence should be updated like this:
"The best product builders do not just listen to users. They understand users in context and make decisions on their behalf."
And this last part is important.
The cost of decisions
Making decisions is hard.
Making decisions means paying a cost.
Every "yes" means many "no"s.
In the end, users experience this cost. Product builders take responsibility for it and should create responsibly.